🔗 Share this article

It's Black History Month in the Britain, and it appears it’s time for a reassessment. Throughout its history, an celebration that began as a celebration and reminder of history, culture and the connections between global Black communities, has developed a corporate feel, broadening to incorporate functions where individuals of African heritage are paid to talk to Caucasian groups about implicit prejudice and active solidarity. The demonstrations for racial justice in the 2020s created a surge in the industry of demonstrating racial awareness. Yet, that phase is now over. The surge has crested, leaving a sort of hollowed out legacy of what raising awareness is for.

The History of Black History Observance

Initially celebrated in the US and Canada, Black History Month was established in 1962 as an observance of African American heritage by African American historian Carter G. Woodson with seven days of celebration and reflection in the second week of February. Black History Month grew out of this movement and was formally inaugurated in 1970. Today it is observed not only in the North America in winter, but also in October in the UK, Germany, Ireland and the the Kingdom of the Netherlands.

The observance has developed since those days, placing less emphasis on the narratives of transatlantic enslavement and civil rights battles, and more on influential individuals of color in politics, culture, and activism, and widely honoring the impact Black people have made to shape the country. It is in educational institutions where Black History Month is most regularly observed, with discussions and heritage festivities. But the way the celebration is observed is a indication of the current political situation. How it develops is a valuable example in how appropriation leads to dismantling: the reshaping of Black History Month has impeded the objective of it, which is to confront structural and organizational discrimination.

---

A Jarring Moment

Few things illustrate how important it is to rethink Black History Month more than the current time in which it falls this year. In the United Kingdom, a resurgent right in the guise of the Reform organization is leading the polls. In the warmer months we witnessed the largest far-right rally in the UK's past. Kemi Badenoch, the person of color at the helm of the right-wing political group, is a staunch adversary of the racial justice movement, and we are in a situation where a member of parliament feels emboldened to say that “not seeing any white faces” in specific city neighborhoods is a cause for alarm. Simultaneously, ultra-nationalist movements are surging in Europe as a complete entity.

In the United States, a colossal assault against DEI and affirmative action has been taken, frequently with success, to the supreme judicial bodies of the nation. A drive to erase African American heritage and narrative from the records is in progress. One of the political figure's early administrative commands focused on the museum of African American legacy, and the renowned cultural organization, claiming they of a coordinated and broad attempt to alter the country's historical narrative” by depicting the United States “as naturally discriminatory”.

Given these circumstances, the month symbolises how insufficiently it can be impactful if it is confined to either dutiful corporate observances, or depoliticized festivities of historical achievements, rather than confronting the realities of the current era. It also demonstrates how its limited duration means that it is disconnected from the broader ongoing work that is needed. An academic expert, a professor at an educational institution, expressed it perfectly when she expressed apprehension about the fleeting superficial actions of the celebration. “The difficulty with embracing a superficial method”, she commented, “is that it typically leads to that Black History Month evolves into a transient display rather than a agent of progress.”

---

Reconsidering, Not Discarding

Determining how to adjust, modify and expand initiatives for fair treatment and appreciation in such moments of dejection and worry is a difficult task. There is a temptation to just eliminate events including Black History Month altogether, believing they are simply not fit for purpose, or are vestiges of an time that has been ineffective.

However, regardless of the situation, Black History Month, and in fact the whole broad system and tradition of activism for racial justice – local anti-racism groups, inclusion and equity efforts, and certainly, even commercial engagements – constitute an infrastructure that a considerable labor has gone into. It is there not only to deteriorate as the political landscape shifts (and in fact, deteriorates), but to be a dynamic entity.

So what would a contemporary active Black History Month look like? Firstly, it would be extended beyond a brief observance: something that is distributed throughout the annual calendar (as various establishments are already beginning to do), elements of its material (particularly around historic Black characters) incorporated into school curriculums. It would also be a time that does not evade governmental matters, and allows opportunity for individuals, particularly the younger generation, to share their anxieties and narratives. What purpose serves mere awareness of the history when it doesn’t reckon with the contemporary truth of ultra-nationalist gatherings in the public spaces? Organizations who celebrate it should not be comforted with the non-confrontational words of hidden discrimination and sensitivity to minor insults, but faced with the dangers that face all if anti-racism is not treated with importance. In short, Black History Month should be made up-to-date, urgent, and responsive. It could be that an complete renaming is necessary – Contemporary Black History Month.